jump to navigation

Suffolk County Personal Injury Attorney Announces Settlement on Slip and Fall in a West Babylon Supermarket April 16, 2012

Posted by Carol L. Schlitt in Slip and Fall.
Tags: , , , ,
comments closed

A Suffolk County woman went shopping at her local supermarket in West Babylon. She slipped on a large pool of water that led to back, neck and shoulder injuries.  She asked me to represent her in an effort to collect compensation for her injuries. The woman retained us to represent her in an effort to collect compensation from the store for its negligence in causing her injuries. We conducted an investigation of the incident and prepared a Case Assessment for our client. We then made a Settlement Proposal to the defense. This past week, we negotiated a settlement that provides good value to our client and will put money in her hands as soon as possible. The settlement made for a very happy client.

The Facts of the Slip and Fall Case in a Suffolk County Supermarket

We handle many supermarket cases and have settled everyone in the past three years. In this case, the woman, who works as a preschool educator, went shopping at her local grocery store.

As she passed the Produce Department on her right, she slipped on a large puddle of clear water.  She slipped and fell forward onto her right knee and right hand.  The manager came to where she fell and brought her a chair.  The manager told my client that the water was caused from a leak in the Produce Department.  The manager gave her an ice pack.

When the woman felt able, she left the store and drove home. The next day she saw her personal doctor who referred her for an MRI and subsequent follow up visits an orthopedist, a spinal specialist and a rehabilitation specialist as well as physical therapy.

Rapid Settlements in Supermarket Slip and Fall Cases

In our experience, many supermarket slip and fall cases result from people slipping on puddles formed by leaks from freezers, refrigerator units and sprinkler systems. Produce areas are the frequent locations of many supermarket cases.

When a client is hurt due to the negligence of a grocery store, the client deserves compensation. We work with clients to move their cases as fast as possible and to maximize the money they obtain. While past results do not guarantee future outcomes, we have settled very supermarket cases that we’ve accepted in the past three years. The ability to settle early depends on the thoroughness of the case preparation, the diligence devoted to our Settlement Proposals, our experience in supermarket cases and our willingness to take these cases to trial. The willingness to take a case to trial makes a settlement more likely.

Settling Quickly and for Good Value

In this case, it took a while for my client’s medical prognosis to become clear. Once her condition stabilized and we understood the full extent of her injuries, we made a Settlement Proposal to the insurance company for the supermarket. The Settlement Proposal provides an analysis of liability and damages as well as our demand to settle the case. We also attach all of the client’s medical records and other evidence so that defense has all the material they need to assess a case and make a settlement offer. Our Settlement Proposal demonstrates the thoroughness of our investigation, medical review and legal analysis, which adds leverage to our settlement demand. After some back and forth negotiating on this case, we were able to reach a settlement that provided good value for our client and gave her money as soon as possible.

I hope you found this information helpful. If you or a loved one has been hurt in a slip and fall at a supermarket or if you have been injured due to another’s negligence, you may want to consult a New York personal injury attorney experienced with slip and fall cases. I would be glad to answer your questions and assist you. The consultation is always free. You can call me at 1-800-660-1466 or email me. You can also visit my website or read more on my blog, New York Law Thoughts.

Carol L. Schlitt
Suffolk County Personal Injury Attorney
www.SchlittLaw.com
http://nylawthoughts.com
1-800-660-1466
Carol@SchlittLaw.com

This material is intended for informational uses only. It is not meant as legal advice. To receive legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Remember, past results do not guarantee similar outcomes in the future.

All content of this site:
© copyright 2010-2012 by Carol L. Schlitt
The material presented in this blog may not be reproduced or appropriated in any way without the explicit permission of the author.

New York Personal Injury Lawyer Announces Settlement for a Slip and Fall in a Stop and Shop Supermarket March 27, 2012

Posted by Carol L. Schlitt in Slip and Fall.
Tags: , , , , ,
comments closed

 

A Queens woman slipped and fell at a Stop & Shop in Nassau County and suffered a tear of the rotator cuff in her left shoulder and a soft tissue injury to her neck and low back. The woman asked us to help her get compensation from the store for her injuries. We conducted an investigation, collected and analyzed the woman’s medical records, produced a detailed Case Assessment and then presented a Settlement Proposal to the claims management firm for Stop & Shop. After negotiating with the claims manager, we reached a settlement that provided good value for our client in less than a month after she concluded treatment for her injuries. The best part of the case came from hearing my client scream with joy over the settlement.

The Facts of this Supermarket Slip and Fall Case

The woman, who lived in Far Rockaway, went grocery shopping at a Nassau County Stop & Shop supermarket. As the woman walked along the freezer aisle, she slipped and fell on a puddle of water. The water came from a leak in the freezer.

Our client lay on the floor in pain particularly in her right knee, left shoulder and left hand. Her friend helped the woman up. The store manager brought her a chair and some water and repeatedly apologized for the puddle.  Our client opted not to go directly to the hospital, but by the next morning she experienced such pain that she went to the emergency room where she began what turned into months of treatment.

Proving Negligence in a Supermarket Slip and Fall Case

We handle many supermarket slip and fall cases from throughout the Long Island and the New York metropolitan area. There are a couple of key issues to address in proving negligence in a supermarket slip and fall case:

  • Do you know what caused you to fall? This issue may seem obvious, but we hear from people who fell and do not know what caused the fall. To pursue compensation, you need to know what caused you to fall. It might have been a puddle or spilled produce or cartons strewn in an aisle, but you need to be able to say definitively what caused your fall.
  • Did the store create the hazard? If the store created the hazard, the store is responsible for the hazard it created. For example, if a puddle forms from a leak from a freezer or refrigerator unit or a sprayer in the produce area, then the store created that hazard. If a grocery store fails to keep the produce area clean and allows fruit and vegetables to lie on the floor, then the store created the hazard. If an employee leaves cartons unattended and strewn about an aisle, then the store created the hazard.
  • Did the store know about the hazard or should they have known? If the store did not create the hazard, then it needs to know about the hazard in advance to be held liable for an injury caused by that hazard. In legal terms, the store needs to have actual or constructive notice of the hazard. Let me use some examples to illustrate this point. If a customer knocks over a display that creates a puddle and someone tells the store management about the puddle, then the store has actual notice. If a customer knocks over a display that creates a puddle in the main aisle and the puddle sits there for a long time (say ten minutes or more), then the store has constructive notice because the store should have noticed. If a customer drops a drink and you immediately slip and fall, then the store has no notice of the hazard. If the store has actual or constructive notice, the store has an opportunity to remove the hazard or warn customers to avoid the hazard. The store can be held liable if it had actual or constructive notice of a hazard that causes a slip and fall injury.
  • Did the store warn about the hazard? If a hazard existed, did the store warn customers about the hazard? If an employee mops the floor and creates a hazard with a wet floor, did the store put up a reasonable warning about the wet floor (e.g., putting up yellow warning signs)? In a current case, an employee at a supermarket spilled some olive oil and my client slipped on the olive oil. Had the employee cleaned up the spill or warned customers to avoid the spill, there would not be a problem. The store bears liability because it created the hazard, failed to clean it up and failed to warn customers of the problem.

If you slip and fall in a supermarket and you know what caused your fall, you might have grounds to prove negligence. You will then need to prove that the store either created the hazard that caused you to fall or had notice about the hazard and failed to clean it up or warn customers. We can help by conducting a rigorous investigation that may involve taking photos, producing diagrams, and finding and interviewing witnesses.  Our experience and knowledge with supermarket cases allows us to develop cases designed to maximize compensation for our clients.

I hope you found this information helpful. If you or a loved one has been hurt in a slip and fall at a supermarket or if you have been injured due to another’s negligence, you may want to consult a New York personal injury attorney experienced with slip and fall cases. I would be glad to answer your questions and assist you. The consultation is always free. You can call me at 1-800-660-1466 or email me. You can also visit my website or read more on my blog, New York Law Thoughts.

Carol L. Schlitt
New York Personal Injury Attorney
www.SchlittLaw.com
www.NYLawThoughts.com
1-800-660-1466
Carol@SchlittLaw.com

This material is intended for informational uses only. It is not meant as legal advice. To receive legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Remember, past results do not guarantee similar outcomes in the future.

All content of this site:
© copyright 2010-2012 by Carol L. Schlitt
The material presented in this blog may not be reproduced or appropriated in any way without the explicit permission of the author.

Slip and Fall Cases: When You Do Not Have a Case March 15, 2012

Posted by Carol L. Schlitt in Consumer News, Slip and Fall.
Tags: , , , ,
comments closed

We handle many slip and fall cases, particularly slip and fall cases that occur in supermarkets and other stores. I have written about many of these cases in an effort to educate people about successful slip and fall cases. This morning, we received a call from a woman who slipped and fell in a store and wanted to know if she had a case. After speaking with her, it occurred to me that it might be worthwhile writing an article about what is not a case.

The Fact Pattern of a Slip and Fall that Is Not a Negligence Case

A woman called today to ask about a slip and fall she suffered. She was in a big box store on Monday, March 12 when she slipped and fell. This morning (Thursday), she felt some pain in her legs and wanted to know if she could sue the store.

I asked first about her health and she said she had some soreness in her leg and was having some difficulty walking. When I asked about the medical care she had received, she revealed that she had not seen a doctor yet. I urged her to see a doctor as soon as possible to receive the treatment that she needed for her leg.

When I asked what caused her to slip and fall, she said, “I’m not sure, some water was there.” I asked if she had spoken to the store manager or any store employees. She said, “No.”

We were confronted with the following facts:

  • The woman was not sure what had caused her to fall.
  • The woman had not reported the incident to the store management or personnel.
  • Four days later, the woman had still not received any health care treatment.

Based on that information, I told the woman that she did not appear to have grounds to pursue a negligence case.

Conditions Needed to Support a Slip and Fall Case in a Supermarket or Store

Let’s look a little closer at the facts of this incident to see what creates grounds for a negligence case. Keep in mind that all negligence cases require a person to show that someone else’s negligence led to an incident that caused injuries and damage to an individual.

1.      You need to know the cause of the slip and fall: To pursue a slip and fall negligence case, you need to know what caused the slip and fall. Many of my clients have slipped and fallen on puddles of water or spilled liquids. To win a case, we need to show that the store caused the dangerous situation, could have prevented it or could have warned customers about it.

If you do not know what caused you to slip and fall, then you cannot to prove negligence.

2.      You need to notify the store manager or store personnel about the incident: It is best if immediately after an incident, you notify store employees. I have handled cases where my client was still on the ground when the manager came. It is important to tell the store personnel so they can record that the incident happened and see the circumstances. Often times, store personnel will apologize, offer to help and explain the source of the puddle or other problem. Store employees can also offer assistance and call for an ambulance or other medical help.

If you do not notify store personnel immediately, then you should return as soon as possible after the incident to speak with the store manager. The caller today had allowed four days to pass without notifying store personnel and that is too long a time unless there are exceptional circumstances.

In investigating a claim, an insurance company will first ask to see the incident report. If there is no incident report, the insurance company will assume that the incident did not happen. We can overcome the lack of an incident report, but it makes settlement talks and a trial that much more difficult.

3.      You need to receive immediate medical attention: In the strongest cases, clients go from the store to the hospital in an ambulance, but that is not necessary. Some people drive to the hospital or a doctor’s office. Some go home and then go to the doctor later that day or the next day. There are two issues here. First, above all else, it is important to get the medical treatment that you need. Second, to build a case, you need to document medical treatment and a connection between the slip and fall incident and that medical treatment.

In this case, the woman had gone four days without contacting a doctor and was calling a lawyer first. It is always more important to contact your doctor first.

We successfully earn compensation for many people who have suffered injuries in slip and falls in supermarkets and other stores. We work hard to earn our clients the most compensation possible, but we can only do so when evidence of a case exists. The three key elements of a successful case are:

  • Knowing what caused the slip and fall
  • Timely notice to the store personnel
  • Medical treatment as soon after the incident as possible

I hope you found this information helpful. If you or a loved one has been hurt in a slip and fall, you may want to consult a New York personal injury attorney experienced with slip and fall cases. I would be glad to answer your questions and assist you. The consultation is always free. You can call me at 1-800-660-1466 or email me. You can also visit my website or read more on my blog, New York Law Thoughts.

Carol L. Schlitt
New York Personal Injury Attorney
www.SchlittLaw.com
http://nylawthoughts.com
1-800-660-1466
Carol@SchlittLaw.com

This material is intended for informational uses only. It is not meant as legal advice. To receive legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Remember, past results do not guarantee similar outcomes in the future.

All content of this site:
© copyright 2010-2012 by Carol L. Schlitt
The material presented in this blog may not be reproduced or appropriated in any way without the explicit permission of the author.

When Does a Lawyer Make a Difference? A Question about an Incident at a Wal-Mart March 7, 2012

Posted by Carol L. Schlitt in Customer Service.
Tags: , ,
comments closed

I received the following question from a woman in another state. The situation is an odd one – a carton of eggs falling on an infant – and it raises a good question about why it is helpful to hire an attorney to represent you in a negligence case.

Question about a Negligence Case

Hi! My daughter is nine weeks old. Last week we were in Wal-Mart and an employee dropped a box of 240 eggs it went into our cart and it landed on my daughters head. I took her to the doctor she had a swollen eye, small laceration, and a mild concussion.

Wal-Mart called and they want to settle. How much is normal to ask for/agree upon for pain and suffering etc. I just want to be educated so I don’t get totally taken advantage of.

Answer

What an awful situation. As a mother of three, I can understand how upsetting it must be to have your infant daughter injured in such a freak manner. Let me walk you through the way to evaluate a case:

First, all cases are evaluated in terms of what they would bring at trial. You need to think this way because that is how the Wal-Mart adjuster is thinking. To prevail at trial, you would need to prove negligence on behalf of Wal-Mart and damages suffered by your daughter. Any trial award would be equal to the percentage of liability multiplied by the value of the damages. So if Wal-Mart was 100 percent responsible and the damages were $10,000, the award would be $10,000 (100% X $10,000). If liability was 50 percent and damages $10,000, then the award would be $5,000 (50% X $10,000).

Proving Negligence

The negligence seems clear, based on what you shared. If a Wal-Mart employee dropped a carton of eggs on your daughter, Wal-Mart would bear 100 percent liability. While liability seems self-evident, it is always helpful to investigate a case and gather evidence to prevent any wiggle room or deniability for the client. Evidence could include photos, statements from other witnesses, names of employees who witnessed the incident or its aftermath, the incident report from the store and medical records that link the incident to your daughter’s injuries.

Proving Damages

Damages depend on many factors. You have described the injuries suffered by your daughter. Thankfully, there appear not to be any serious or long lasting injuries, though you need to closely monitor the impact of the concussion. That’s good news, though the limited injuries will limit the value of the damages in this case. You do need to make sure that there is no long-term impact from the incident.

If I were your attorney, I would conduct case law research to identify similar cases in your area and the value of those cases. This research would help determine the value of your daughter’s case. The value is affected by the extent of your daughter’s injuries, the extensiveness of the treatment and the impact on her life. It is also affected by awards in other cases within your area. Determining the value of damages is part science and part art and requires a thorough understanding of your daughter’s injuries, the law and a feel for how such a case would be received in your area.

A Good Lawyer Makes a Difference

People are always free to negotiate cases on their own and, in some instances, they are better off doing so. At the same time, an insurance adjuster will almost always advise victims not to contact an attorney. Remember, the adjuster, no matter how nice, sincere and well-meaning, works for the other side and does not have your best interest at heart.

A good personal injury lawyer will offer a free consultation and advise you if you are better handling a case on your own or hiring an attorney. In this blog and in my consultations, I often will tell potential clients that they are better off negotiating on their own or going to small claims court. In those cases, the issues seem clear and the dollar amounts small. The client is better off not hiring an attorney and keeping more of the money for him or herself.

A lawyer is most helpful when the issues are not clear or the values are higher. Remember, the insurance adjuster will do all he or she can to limit a payout. A good lawyer will understand the liability issues and how to best develop a case. A good lawyer will carefully assess the damages, knowing the impact on the client’s life, researching case law. A good lawyer will know how to present the case in negotiations or in court to maximize the compensation a client receives. In our practice we devote ourselves to customer service with a strong emphasis on communication, education and responsiveness, but we understand that clients evaluate the outcome by the amount of money they receive. Therefore, we commit ourselves to maximizing the compensation that our clients receive.

Case values vary depending on the court and the county where the case will be heard. I practice law in the New York metropolitan area and cases with identical fact patterns would have different values in different counties. It takes an attorney with good local knowledge to know the difference.

Most attorneys charge a flat fee of 33-1/3 percent of any award or settlement. A good lawyer will make it so that even after paying the legal fee, you receive more than you would if you negotiated a settlement on your own. Likewise, a good lawyer will tell you if you are better off taking a settlement and not hiring an attorney.

General Advice

I cannot offer legal advice on this case without knowing more details. I can offer some general advice. I recommend that you consult a good local personal injury attorney who can advise you whether you are better off settling on your own for a low amount or having an attorney take this case and increasing the overall value of the settlement amount. Look for an attorney experienced with supermarket and department store cases.

I hope you found this information helpful. If you or a loved one has been hurt due to the negligence of another person or company, you may want to consult a New York personal injury attorney experienced with slip and fall cases. I would be glad to answer your questions and assist you. The consultation is always free. You can call me at 1-800-660-1466 or email me. You can also visit my website or read more on my blog, New York Law Thoughts.

Carol L. Schlitt
New York Personal Injury Attorney
www.SchlittLaw.com
http://nylawthoughts.com
1-800-660-1466
Carol@SchlittLaw.com

This material is intended for informational uses only. It is not meant as legal advice. To receive legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Remember, past results do not guarantee similar outcomes in the future.

All content of this site:
© copyright 2010-2012 by Carol L. Schlitt
The material presented in this blog may not be reproduced or appropriated in any way without the explicit permission of the author.

 

Settlement for a Slip and Fall in a Brooklyn Supermarket January 10, 2012

Posted by Carol L. Schlitt in Slip and Fall.
Tags: , , ,
comments closed

In July 2011, a woman entered her local Pathmark supermarket in the Sunset Park section of Brooklyn. As she walked towards the front of the store, she slipped on a small puddle of water and fell. The slip and fall left her with injuries to her back and leg. She asked me to represent her in an effort to collect compensation for her injuries. After conducting an investigation of her case and negotiating with the claims manager for the supermarket, we reached a settlement. Less than 20 days later, her settlement check arrived today, making her a very happy client.

The Facts of the Slip and Fall Case in the Supermarket

The woman had entered Pathmark to do some grocery shopping. She was dressed casually and wearing rubber flip-flop sandals. A small puddle of water – approximately 2 feet by 2 feet – had formed in front of aisles 17 and 18 of the supermarket, but it was not obvious to the observer. The woman walked in the area as part of her shopping and slipped on the puddle. Her feet went out from under her and she reached out to brace herself, but she landed on her behind.

Other patrons immediately came to her assistance and the store manager came over to help. The store manager called for an ambulance which took the woman to Methodist Hospital.

Proving Liability in a Supermarket Slip and Fall Case

The challenge in this case was to prove that the store was negligent in allowing the puddle and not cleaning it up or warning customers of the hazard. In this case, we had the statements of our client and the man who was shopping with her. We also managed to interview the store manager, who corroborated our client’s account of events. Using photographs and diagrams, we were able to demonstrate that this puddle formed in an area with high foot traffic that was immediately visible to the personnel working in the front-end of the store.

We built an argument that demonstrated that the water came from a leaking freezer and was in an area that the store should monitor and keep safe and was in an area that store personnel could easily see.

With this evidence and the way we built our arguments, we were able to present a compelling case to the defendant.

Settling a Case Quickly and for Good Value

While I love my work as a lawyer, I cannot stand the slowness of this business. So many cases take too long to resolve. In our law firm, we commit ourselves to moving every case as fast as possible. In this case, as soon as we completed our investigation and as soon as my client’s medical condition stabilized, we sent a Settlement Proposal to the insurance company for the supermarket. We entered into negotiations and when they asked for additional information, I provided it right away. In the end, we were able to settle the case for good value at an amount that pleased my client and we did so in less than six months with the settlement check arriving six months from the date of the incident.

I hope you found this information helpful. If you or a loved one has been hurt in a slip and fall at a supermarket or if you have been injured due to another’s negligence, you may want to consult a New York personal injury attorney experienced with slip and fall cases. I would be glad to answer your questions and assist you. The consultation is always free. You can call me at 1-800-660-1466 or email me. You can also visit my website or read more on my blog, New York Law Thoughts.

Carol L. Schlitt
New York Personal Injury Attorney
www.SchlittLaw.com
http://nylawthoughts.com
1-800-660-1466
Carol@SchlittLaw.com

This material is intended for informational uses only. It is not meant as legal advice. To receive legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Remember: past performance does not guarantee future results.

Settlement for Slip and Fall on Ice in a Supermarket Parking Lot December 15, 2011

Posted by Carol L. Schlitt in Slip and Fall.
Tags: , , ,
comments closed

On a chilly February morning, a woman went shopping at her local supermarket. After loading her bags in her car, she turned to return the shopping cart and slipped and fell on some uncleared ice. The fall left her with an injured back and a slight fracture in her wrist – an avulsion fracture at the base of the fifth metacarpal.  A slip and fall on ice can happen to anyone, but the cause becomes negligence when a store owner fails to clear the ice and snow from a parking lot. In this case, the woman asked me for assistance. We investigated the case, analyzed her medical records and prepared an assessment of her case. We then engaged in settlement talks with the defendants and reached a settlement this week that left the woman very pleased.

 Proving Negligence in a Slip and Fall on Ice  

We all know how treacherous walking on snow and ice can be and need to take precautions to avoid slips and falls. A slip on ice can be one of those things that happen. However, if the slip results because a property owner failed to adequately clear ice and snow, then it becomes a case of liability.

In this case, the supermarket owner failed to clear the parking lot of ice and snow. The last snow had fallen four days earlier, yet the supermarket had still failed to clear the parking lot. They had a responsibility to provide for the safety of their customers. The store failed to do so. That failure, made them liable for injuries suffered if someone slipped and fell on ice in their parking lot.

In our investigation, not only did we procure weather reports and arrange for photos of the scene, but we also found a witness who corroborated our client’s version of events. A thorough investigation helps build a case and makes it more valuable for our client.

Determining the Value of the Case in a Slip and Fall on Ice

To determine the value of the case, I started by interviewing my client and collecting all of her medical records. I needed to understand the impact this injury had on her life. I reviewed the medical records and sought the input of an expert nurse reviewer. We highlighted the diagnosis and treatment my client received.

I then conducted the legal research to find similar cases and the value those cases brought at trial. It is vital to understand what a case will bring at trial. While each case is unique and stands on its own merits, my past cases and trial research provide a foundation for arguments to maximize the compensation for the current case. 

Settling the Slip and Fall on Ice Case

Once I complete my investigation and my analysis of the damages, I prepare a case assessment for my client which projects the value of her case at trial and the value in settlement. I review that assessment with my client and, with her approval, I prepared a settlement proposal for the defense. In this case, the supermarket owner (Pathmark) pointed the finger at their contractor who had responsibility for clearing the parking lot of snow and ice. I negotiated with both and both agreed to contribute towards a settlement. After considerable back and forth, both sides made an acceptable offer. I reviewed that offer with my client and then went back to the negotiating table to push the offer higher. When we received the higher offer, my client chose to settle the case.

I hope you found this information helpful. If you or a loved one has been hurt in a slip and fall on ice, particularly one in a supermarket parking lot, you may want to consult a New York personal injury attorney experienced with injuries in similar cases. I have extensive success with slip and fall on ice cases and with supermarket cases. I would be glad to answer your questions and assist you. The consultation is free. You can call me at 1-800-660-1466 or email me. You can also visit my website or read more on my blog, New York Law Thoughts.

 

Carol L. Schlitt
New York Personal Injury Attorney
www.SchlittLaw.com
1-800-660-1466
Carol@SchlittLaw.com

This material is intended for informational uses only. It is not meant as legal advice. To receive legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Remember, past results do not guarantee similar outcomes in the future. Each case is unique and will have a unique outcome.

All content of this site:

© copyright 2010-2011 by Carol L. Schlitt
The material presented in this blog may not be reproduced or appropriated in any way without the explicit permission of the author.

Settlement of a Slip and Fall Case at Long Island Supermarket April 18, 2011

Posted by Carol L. Schlitt in Personal Injury Law, Premises Liability, Slip and Fall.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,
comments closed

In November 2010, a school teacher entered a Hempstead supermarket to pick up some dinner. While shopping, she slipped and fell on some spilled liquid, injuring her back and knee. Six months later, we completed our investigation of her case and have now negotiated a settlement to compensate the woman for her pain and suffering. The woman is grateful both for the amount of compensation she will receive and the speed with which she will receive it.

The Facts of the Slip and Fall Case Against the Supermarket

Shopping by herself, the woman pushed a cart and put grocery items in the cart. As she entered the soda aisle, her feet slipped out from under her and she landed on her back. The right side of her body hit the floor and the left leg bent behind her.

A manager from the supermarket arrived at the scene but seemed more interested in questioning the victim than offering her assistance. In fact, it was a witness who called 911 to request an ambulance for the woman. After the fact, store employees put up warning signs to let customer know about the spilled liquid.

Our investigation documented the nature and cause of the fall and the fact that there were no warning signs prior to the slip and fall. We identified three independent witnesses, two of whom had taken cell phone photos of the woman on the ground and the accident scene.  We interviewed those witnesses to record their statements and document the liability of the supermarket.

Slip and fall cases can be hard to prove as juries, especially Long Island juries, tend to assign blame to the victims for not taking proper precautions. In this case, the ability to identify three independent witnesses and to produce photos of the scene greatly bolstered our case. Plus, our client proved to be a very credible witness.

Documenting Damages in a Slip and Fall Case with a Limited Injury

The woman who fell contacted me within days of the accident occurring. At the time, she had been to the emergency room. Her immediate concern focused on her knee.

We helped the woman find an orthopedist who could diagnose and treat her for back and leg issues.  X-rays determined that the woman had not suffered any broken bones or fractures, though she did have some soft tissue damage. The treatment with the orthopedist addressed those issues.

Settling a Slip and Fall Case Quickly and for Good Value

Once the woman’s medical status stabilized and the full extent of her injuries became clear, we were able to prepare an assessment of the case. We built a strong case proving the supermarket’s liability. Examinations by the woman’s treating doctors revealed no long-term injuries. We were able to document the injuries she did suffer and the damages those caused. Thankfully, the woman did not suffer any major or long-term injuries as a result of this accident.

After reviewing the case assessment with my client, I presented a comprehensive settlement package to the defense.  The settlement package provides the insurance company with all the information they need to assess the case. The settlement package also made clear the strength of our own case and the ability to pursue it at trial. By acting before we filed a lawsuit, I minimize the expenses for both sides, which made it easier for the insurer to settle the case and maximize the amount my client received.

I negotiated the best possible settlement offer for my client. At every step, I kept my client informed of the offers made and the choices she had.  The woman decided to accept the settlement offer and avoid the delays and time required for a trial.

 We work hard to rigorously investigate and prepare each case and strive to squeeze every day out of the legal process. This accident happened in November 2010 and we reached a settlement before the middle of April, less than six months later.

I hope you found this information helpful. If you or a loved one has been hurt in a slip and fall or if you have been injured due to another’s negligence, you may want to consult a New York personal injury attorney experienced with slip and fall cases. I would be glad to answer your questions and assist you. The consultation is always free. You can call me at 1-800-660-1466 or email me. You can also visit my website or read more on my blog, New York Law Thoughts.  

Carol L. Schlitt
New York Personal Injury Attorney
www.SchlittLaw.com
http://nylawthoughts.com
1-800-660-1466
Carol@SchlittLaw.com

This material is intended for informational uses only. It is not meant as legal advice. To receive legal advice, you should consult an attorney. Remember, each case has a unique fact pattern. Past results do not
guarantee future outcomes.

Slip and Fall at a Supermarket: A Case Study June 21, 2010

Posted by Carol L. Schlitt in Premises Liability, Slip and Fall, Trip and Fall.
Tags: , , , , , ,
comments closed

Over the years, I have represented many clients who have hurt themselves in slips and falls at supermarkets. We do not think of our local supermarket as a hazardous location, yet it turns out they are prone to small puddles due to spills and problems with coolers. In the last few years alone, I have handled half a dozen cases where my clients slipped and fell on a puddle inside a supermarket.  Here are is a sample case:

A Case of a Slip and Fall in a Supermarket

On a snowy January night, a retired man entered a small supermarket in the Bronx, walking across a black mat placed in the entrance to capture water from patron’s shoes as they entered the store. He headed towards the juice aisle near the coolers and some drink fountains.  As the man turned to enter the appropriate aisle, he slipped and fell on accumulated water on the floor and landed on his right hip. He lay motionless on the ground and called for help. After initially ignoring his cries, the store employees came and offered to help the man. Because of the pain in his hip, the man was unable to stand and one of the employees brought out a milk crate on which he could sit.

The man asked the employees to call an ambulance and the employees laughed at him. After multiple requests, an employee finally called for an ambulance. The man had entered the store at approximately 2:25 a.m. and the ambulance records show that no one called for an ambulance until 2:55 a.m. Their delay and behavior caused great anguish, pain and humiliation for my client.

While the man waited for an ambulance, the store manager placed a warning sign over the accumulated water, though he did not clean or remove the water during the time that my client was in the store waiting for the ambulance.

Hospital x-rays revealed that the man had fractured his pubis. While doctors opted not to perform surgery, they kept the man in the hospital for six days and he underwent a long and rigorous physical therapy program after discharge.

Seeking Compensation

The man came to me seeking help. He wanted to make sure the supermarket paid for his medical bills, but he also wanted compensation for the injuries he suffered and the humiliation he felt when the employees laughed at him and refused his requests for assistance.

We had to prove that the supermarket was liable for the man’s fall. We did so using several key points of evidence and testimony:

  • The client testified that he slipped and, when he fell, he landed in the small puddle that caused the fall.
  • The store was aware of the potential for water to gather indicated both by the mat they placed to collect water from patrons and because water had gathered at the same spot on a regular basis.
  • The ambulance recorded that the man slipped and fell and was wet from the puddle.
  • The store manager testified that, after the fact, he placed a warning sign because of the puddle.

The defense argued that the store employees were unaware of the puddle and when they learned of it, the manager put up the warning sign. We argued that the store manager should have been aware of the puddle because he knew people were tracking water into the store and because water gathered in that area before.

We documented the damages suffered by the man in several ways:

  • Medical records documented the nature of the injury and the treatment needed for the injury.
  • The man testified about his pain and suffering, the recovery period and his diminished movement.
  • Statements of friends about the differences between the man’s activity levels before and after the incident and the effort his recovery required.

Ultimately, the defense believed we could prove the supermarket’s liability in court and could document the injuries. They settled the case for $60,000.

Winning a Negligence Case Against a Supermarket

When I receive a call and the client says, “I fell and hurt myself in a supermarket, do I have a case?” I explain the two conditions they must meet to seek damages in a supermarket fall:

  1. You must have suffered damages. This requirement may seem obvious. If I trip and fall, land on the ground, get up, dust myself off and keep walking, then I have suffered no damages. If I trip and fall, twist my ankle, require a soft cast and have limited movement for several weeks, I have suffered damages. If I break a bone in my hand and hurt my back, tear my best suit, spend a week in the hospital and miss six months of work due to medical rehabilitation, then I have suffered significant damages.
  2. The other person or party must have caused this accident through their negligence or direct action. It is not enough that you trip and fell; the supermarket must have caused you to trip or fall and we need to be able to prove the negligence of the supermarket. 

If You Have Hurt Yourself in a Fall at A Supermarket

If you or someone you love is injured in a fall, the most important objective is to treat that person’s medical needs. See a doctor as soon as possible or go to an emergency room. It is important to follow the doctor’s orders. If the doctor recommends physical therapy, make sure you follow through with the physical therapy.

If you think you have a case, you should consult with a personal injury attorney who has handled supermarket cases. That attorney can evaluate your case and guide you. You should not have to pay a fee for that consultation.

You can help your case by gathering as much information about the incident and accident scene as soon as possible. These steps include:

  • Write down the exact address and location of the accident.
  • Take pictures of the accident scene. Remember, your phone might have a camera.
  • Write down the names and contact information of any witnesses.
  • Take notes about the accident. What happened right before the accident, the actual event and the aftermath.

I like to visit the supermarket with my client to make sure that I understand exactly how the incident occurred and to prepare the best possible prosecution of the case. 

If the supermarket did not file a incident report, your attorney will guide you on filing that report.  If you are contacted by a representative from the supermarket or the insurance company for the supermarket, you should refer that person to your attorney. Making a misstatement or saying the wrong thing can undermine your case, which is why it is best to refer inquiries to your attorney.

I hope you found this information helpful. If you or a loved one have been hurt in a slip and fall at a supermarket, you may want to consult a New York personal injury attorney experienced with supermarket cases. I would be glad to answer your questions and assist you. You can call me at 1-800-660-1466 or email me. You can also visit my website or read more on my blog, New York Law Thoughts.  

Carol L. Schlitt
New York Personal Injury Attorney
www.SchlittLaw.com
1-800-660-1466
Carol@SchlittLaw.com

This material is intended for informational uses only. It is not meant as legal advice. To receive legal advice, you should consult an attorney.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.